Please share:

Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Published in the NEJM in 2023, this RCT recruited 1,643 patients from the UK aged 50-69 with localized prostate cancer. They received either prostatectomy, radiotherapy or active monitoring. Of course, patients could change treatment later (61% of those under active monitoring did so). After a median follow-up of 15 years, 356 men died, thereof “only” 45 from prostate cancer (13% of deaths). There was no significant difference (P=0.53) concerning death from prostate cancer between the three treatment options:

Other outcomes were significantly worse for active monitoring vs. prostatectomy/radiotherapy. Specifically, metastases developed in 9% vs. 5%, androgen deprivation therapy was initiated in 13% vs. 7%, and clinical progression occurred in 26% vs. 11%.

However, patient-reported outcomes were worse for radical prostatectomy, namely long-term urinary and sexual harms:

The study authors concluded that “patients newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer should carefully consider the trade-offs between treatment harms and the risks of prostate cancer progression in the context of low cancer-specific mortality”.

Disclaimer: This site and its related services are for informational purposes only and do not provide medical advice. The use of any information provided is solely at your own risk. Neither the site owner nor site contributors can accept responsibility for any loss, damage or injury that arises from the use of this website or services. More information here.

Essential Updates
“exciting, practical, evidence-based, short”
2-min reads by & for GPs.
Free, no pharma money.

More Info & Sign-up.

More to explore

Stars of Medicine

8 Gründe, warum Hausärzte die eigentlichen Stars der Medizin sind

Ich bin überzeugt, dass Hausärzte das Rückgrat eines effektiven Gesundheitssystems sind. Hier finden Sie einen leicht verständlichen Überblick über die Beweise, die diese Behauptung zweifelsohne unterstützen!

What Does “NNT” Mean and Why Should You Care?

An article explaining the essentials related to the Number Needed to Treat (NNT): how it’s calculated, why it’s crucial for clinical decision-making, the key factors influencing its interpretation, and common …

The Landmark PSA Study is Back: Benefits are Real, but Worth the Harm?

The long-awaited 23-year results of the European Prostate Cancer Screening Study (ERSPC) are finally here. PSA screening saves about 2 lives per 1,000 men but leads to 27 extra diagnoses—highlighting …

Obesity Management

Why Most Doctors Are Wrong About Obesity Management

Most doctors are managing obesity based on opinion, not on evidence. This easy-to-read summary of key studies might challenge your thinking and clinical practice…

Key Facts GPs Should Know About GLP-1 Analogs

As demand is high and availability is low: which patients should get GLP-analogs first? What are the true benefits and side effects? Here you can find everything you need to …