Please share:

Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Published in the NEJM in 2023, this RCT recruited 1,643 patients from the UK aged 50-69 with localized prostate cancer. They received either prostatectomy, radiotherapy or active monitoring. Of course, patients could change treatment later (61% of those under active monitoring did so). After a median follow-up of 15 years, 356 men died, thereof “only” 45 from prostate cancer (13% of deaths). There was no significant difference (P=0.53) concerning death from prostate cancer between the three treatment options:

Other outcomes were significantly worse for active monitoring vs. prostatectomy/radiotherapy. Specifically, metastases developed in 9% vs. 5%, androgen deprivation therapy was initiated in 13% vs. 7%, and clinical progression occurred in 26% vs. 11%.

However, patient-reported outcomes were worse for radical prostatectomy, namely long-term urinary and sexual harms:

The study authors concluded that “patients newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer should carefully consider the trade-offs between treatment harms and the risks of prostate cancer progression in the context of low cancer-specific mortality”.

Disclaimer: This site and its related services are for informational purposes only and do not provide medical advice. The use of any information provided is solely at your own risk. Neither the site owner nor site contributors can accept responsibility for any loss, damage or injury that arises from the use of this website or services. More information here.

Essential Updates
“exciting, practical, evidence-based, short”
2-min reads by & for GPs.
Free, no pharma money.

More Info & Sign-up.

More to explore

Is the “Surprise Question” meaningful?

The “Surprise Question” is a quick tool for assessing prognosis in palliative care. But is this common gut-check reliable? Have a look at the evidence!
Obesity Management

Why Most Doctors Are Wrong About Obesity Management

Most doctors are managing obesity based on opinion, not on evidence. This easy-to-read summary of key studies might challenge your thinking and clinical practice…

The 7 Habits of Great Family Doctors.

What makes a great family doctor? We asked 468 GPs from 48 countries to share their best professional advice. From truly listening to patients and nurturing collegial networks to lifelong learning and self-care — this global survey distilled their insights into seven transformative habits and a four-week challenge to help you integrate them into your daily…

The Landmark PSA Study is Back: Benefits are Real, but Worth the Harm?

The long-awaited 23-year results of the European Prostate Cancer Screening Study (ERSPC) are finally here. PSA screening saves about 2 lives per 1,000 men but leads to 27 extra diagnoses—highlighting the tough balance between benefit and harm. This update breaks down the numbers, explains why the debate continues, and offers practical tips for shared decision-making in…

Teach-Back for GPs: An Evidence-Based Communication Tool

The Teach-Back-Method helps Family Doctors to improve patient understanding and recall. It’s a simple communication tool, it’s evidence-based and it’s quick. Here you can read everything you need to know to apply it tomorrow morning.

Discover more from Family Medicine Initiative

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading