Please share:

Is the “Surprise Question” meaningful?

The question “Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?” aims to identify patients at high risk of death who could benefit from palliative care. But how reliable is this subjective assessment?

A Systematic Review (2017) analyzed 17 studies on this topic. The result showed a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 80%. The authors concluded that the “Surprise Question” has poor to moderate accuracy in predicting death within the next 12 months. However, they emphasized that this question is neither “good” nor “bad” but should be supplemented with clinical indicators (which some palliative care scores already do).

An older BMJ Studie (2000) surveyed 343 doctors on how long 468 terminally ill patients (at the time of their hospice referral; average age 69) were likely to live. The actual average survival time of these patients was 24 days. Although experienced doctors were more accurate, most were still off the mark:

Conclusion:

The “Surprise Question” is simple and quick, but it is often inaccurate. It seems that we doctors are not particularly good at intuitively assessing the risk of death, and we tend to be too optimistic.

Disclaimer: This site and its related services are for informational purposes only and do not provide medical advice. The use of any information provided is solely at your own risk. Neither the site owner nor site contributors can accept responsibility for any loss, damage or injury that arises from the use of this website or services. More information here.

Essential Updates
“exciting, practical, evidence-based, short”
2-min reads by & for GPs.
Free, no pharma money.

More Info & Sign-up.

More to explore

Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

A 15-year RCT found no survival difference between monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, but notable trade-offs in disease progression and treatment-related side effects. Careful decision-making and risk …

Fishhook Removal Techniques for GPs

Discover four essential fishhook removal techniques, when and how to apply them safely, and crucial aftercare tips. Includes expert advice, practical videos, and evidence-based guidance on antibiotic use.

<div class="likebtn_container" …
Stars of Medicine

8 Gründe, warum Hausärzte die eigentlichen Stars der Medizin sind

Ich bin überzeugt, dass Hausärzte das Rückgrat eines effektiven Gesundheitssystems sind. Hier finden Sie einen leicht verständlichen Überblick über die Beweise, die diese Behauptung zweifelsohne unterstützen!

Teach-Back for GPs: An Evidence-Based Communication Tool

The Teach-Back-Method helps Family Doctors to improve patient understanding and recall. It’s a simple communication tool, it’s evidence-based and it’s quick. Here you can read everything you need to know …

The Landmark PSA Study is Back: Benefits are Real, but Worth the Harm?

The long-awaited 23-year results of the European Prostate Cancer Screening Study (ERSPC) are finally here. PSA screening saves about 2 lives per 1,000 men but leads to 27 extra diagnoses—highlighting …

Discover more from Family Medicine Initiative

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading