Please share:

Fishhook Removal Techniques for GPs

So far I had only one patient with a fishhook injury, but it was a story to remember! There are four common methods for removing a fishhook, which are explained well in the journal American Family Physician:

  • Retrograde: the simplest method, but it only works in some cases.
  • String-Yank: usually the least traumatic as it doesn’t create new wounds, but you must be familiar with the method, and bystanders should exercise caution! Watch a 3-min-video here.
  • Advance and Cut: the most frequently used one, due to its high success rate.
  • Needle Cover: works well for large hooks that are superficially embedded or located in areas of flaccid skin. Watch this 3-min-video.

Before removing a fishhook, ensure it is not located in sensitive areas such as the eyes, neck, genitalia, nerves, arteries, or mucosa. Determine the type of barbs involved by asking the patient to draw them. And don’t forget about lidocaine when needed. Afterwards, examine the wound, wash it regularly, apply antibiotic ointment, and check the patient’s tetanus status. While a 2019 review involving 165 patients showed that oral antibiotics were prescribed in 57% of cases, the MSD Manual and Penninger & Fowler’s (4th Edt) recommend routine antibiotic use only in immunocompromised patients or contaminated wounds.

Disclaimer: This site and its related services are for informational purposes only and do not provide medical advice. The use of any information provided is solely at your own risk. Neither the site owner nor site contributors can accept responsibility for any loss, damage or injury that arises from the use of this website or services. More information here.

Essential Updates
“exciting, practical, evidence-based, short”
2-min reads by & for GPs.
Free, no pharma money.

More Info & Sign-up.

More to explore

Should We Screen for Atrial Fibrillation? ESC Says Yes (2024), Evidence Says…?

Despite recent trials showing no benefit and other bodies advising against it, new 2024 ESC guidelines recommend widespread atrial fibrillation screening. Let’s look at the evidence and other recommendations.

Teach-Back for GPs: An Evidence-Based Communication Tool

The Teach-Back-Method helps Family Doctors to improve patient understanding and recall. It’s a simple communication tool, it’s evidence-based and it’s quick. Here you can read everything you need to know to apply it tomorrow morning.

Paracetamol in Pregnancy and Autism Risk: An Evidence-Based Update

Paracetamol has long been considered the safest pain and fever medication during pregnancy. Recently, questions have been raised about a possible link between prenatal paracetamol exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism. This article explores the key studies, public health recommendations, and clinical implications behind the ongoing paracetamol–autism debate.

Vitamin C for Fatigue? A 90-Year-Old Myth & The Current Evidence

Is high‑dose vitamin C the answer to chronic fatigue? The 1930s marketing campaign that sparked this belief still shapes patient requests today. This post unpacks the myth’s origins, reviews the latest evidence—from colds and wound healing to ME/CFS and cancer—and closes with practical counseling tips for family physicians. Spoiler: the data remain thinner than you might expect.

Is the “Surprise Question” meaningful?

The “Surprise Question” is a quick tool for assessing prognosis in palliative care. But is this common gut-check reliable? Have a look at the evidence!

Discover more from Family Medicine Initiative

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading